Onteddu Joji Reddy1, Jamkhana Abdul Gaffor2, Bursupalle Mahesh Reddy3, Balla Suresh4
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide. As early detection can decrease the deaths due to breast cancer, high sensitive and specific tests are necessary to evaluate breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
80 patients with complaint of pain or lump in the breast or nipple discharge were evaluated by mammography, sonomammography and real-time elastography. Imaging studies were compared with the FNAC/biopsy of lesions.
RESULTS
Mammography has sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV as 80%, 95.5%, 93.3%, 86%, respectively. Sonomammography has sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV as 74.2%, 91%, 86%, 82%, respectively. Real-time elastography has sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV as 91.4%, 94.4%, 94.1%, 91.8%, respectively. Combined mammography and sonomammography has sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV as 82.8%, 93.3%, 90.6%, 87.5%, respectively. Combined sonomammography and elastography has sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV as 91.4%, 97.2%, 96.96%, 92.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Combination of CR mammography, sonomammography and real-time elastography has high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses obviating the use of higher modalities like MRI, CAD and digital tomosynthesis, which is very useful in resource poor countries like India.
