Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test and Ratio of Height to Thyromental Distance in Predicting Difficult Tracheal Intubation in South Indian Population â?? A Descriptive Study

Abstract

Baseema Thayyil1, Neetha Thattaparambil Chandran2, Asish Karthik3, Maya Gomathy Amma4

BACKGROUND
Failure in managing the airway is the most important cause of death in patients
undergoing general anaesthesia (GA). For effectively preventing airway
catastrophe it is essential to have a meticulous airway assessment pre-operatively.
Many methods are in use to predict difficult airway like Mallampati, Wilson’s
scoring, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scoring, Cormack - Lehane
classification, thyromental distance, mandibular hyoid distance, atlantooccipital
joint extension etc. In this study, we compared between two popular methods of
airway assessment, upper lip bite test (ULBT) and height to thyromental distance
ratio (RHTMD) to predict the difficulty in tracheal intubation.
METHODS
This descriptive study was conducted at Government Medical college, Thrissur,
over a period of one year , on 76 patients of American society of Anaesthesiologist
(ASA) - PS l - lll, requiring general anaesthesia. ULBT and RHTMD were used to
assess the patient’s airway. It was correlated with Cormack - Lehane classification
during direct laryngoscopy. The data was analysed using Fisher exact test (P <
0.05) and Kappa statistics.
RESULTS
Out of the 76 patients, 41 (53.9%) were women 35 were men (46.1 %). ULBT
predicted 89.6 % [25 + 43] belonging to class 1 and 2 as easy, while 10.5 % [8]
of class 3 as difficult. RHTMD predicted 35 patients (46 %) as easy (grade 1) and
41 patients (54 %) as grade 2. Using ULBT, of the 8 patients predicted to have
difficult intubation (Class 3), 2 were found practically difficult and 6 were easy. In
remaining 68 patients, 23 patients had difficult view and 45 had easy view.
According to Cormac and Lehane, among 41 patients who predicted difficult by
RHTMD, 19 patients were practically difficult and 22 were easy. Of 35 patients, 6
patients were difficult and 29 were easy.
CONCLUSIONS
The RHTMD is more sensitive compared to ULBT in predicting difficult intubation.
As assessed by Cormack - Lehane classification.
 

image