Research Article - (2022) Volume 9, Issue 10

Knowledge and Awareness about Pharmacogenomics and Personalized medicine among the students of College of Medicine, Shaqra University in Dawadmi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Inbaraj Susai Domnic, Faisal Fahad Al Otaibi, Noureldaim Elnoman Elbadawi*, Prasanna Mohana Bhaskaran, Mohammad Azhar Rashikh and Dinesh Dimri
 
Department of Medicine, Shaqra University, Sahqra, Saudi Arabia
 
*Correspondence: Noureldaim Elnoman Elbadawi, Department of Medicine, Shaqra University, Sahqra, Saudi Arabia, Email:

Received: Apr 04, 2022, Manuscript No. JEBMH-22-55631; Editor assigned: Apr 06, 2022, Pre QC No. JEBMH-22-55631; Reviewed: Apr 20, 2022, QC No. JEBMH-22-55631; Revised: Jun 02, 2022, Manuscript No. JEBMH-22-55631; Published: Jun 14, 2022, DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2022/09.10.42

Citation: Domnic IS, Otaibi FFA, Elbadawi NE, et al. Knowledge and Awareness about Pharmacogenomics and Personalized medicine among the students of College of Medicine, Shaqra University in Dawadmi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2022;9(10):42.

Abstract

Introduction

Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine are the two rapidly emerging areas in medical field which will determine the drug therapy of the future. It is very important for current medical students to be aware of these medical fields and apply these principles in their medical practice. There is huge scope for research in this area; hence an awareness study was conducted among medical students of college of medicine, Shaqra University, Dawadmi.

Methods

A cross sectional questionnaire - based study was conducted among the medical students of Shaqra University, Dawadmi by self - administered questionnaire. 150 students participated in the study.

Results

Out of the 150 students participated in the study Pharmacogenomics is relevant to my education 25 % strongly agree. 45 % agreed to recommend pharmacogenomics testing. Familiarity with genetics is only 16 % and only 14 % is familiar with interpreting results of pharmacogenomics tests. Knowledge testing showed overall less percentage. Only 16 % can identify drugs that require pharmacogenomics testing. But 36 % are confident to use the results of pharmacogenomics tests to make an appropriate adjustment to a patient’s drug therapy. Knowledge about personalized medicine is 31 % with scale of 3 out of 7. 40 % of students agreed to undergo genetic testing. 52 % of the participants agreed to know about their risk for developing genetic based chronic diseases.

Conclusion

There is genuine interest and awareness about Pharmacogenomics and Personalized medicine among the medical students but the knowledge is lacking. Hence including these areas in the undergraduate medical curriculum will impart valuable knowledge to the future medical students.

Keywords

Pharmacogenomics, Personalized medicine, Pharmacokinetic testing

Introduction

Pharmacogenomics refers to the study of genetic polymorphisms in drug response.1 It is a rapidly developing research field due to the newer technologies like Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to scan the genome with precision.2 the potential areas of importance are the prediction of personalized medicine, tailor made individual drug prescriptions and reducing the potential adverse drug reactions. There is opportunity for increasing the efficacy and reducing the toxicity of drugs as well as promoting research towards newer drug development.3 There is unmet demand of pharmacokinetic studies in special category i.e., pregnancy. In developed countries pregnant women take many prescribed drugs apart from nutritional supplements. There is more chance of adverse effects during this precious period, hence Pharmacokinetic studies are more important for drug therapy in pregnant women.4 Personalized medicine is an evolving discipline addressing individual patient’s healthcare needs in diagnosis and treatment depending on the genetic sequencing.5 It helps in prevention and management of diseases in an effective manner by optimal, targeted drug delivery according to patient needs and provides better prognosis with cost -effectiveness.6 In 2019, 11 new personalized medicines were approved by FDA including gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy, the first treatment to address the root cause. The other uses of newer personalized drugs are combatting cancer and avoiding potential adverse effects.7as the two fields are growing rapidly, we want to assess the knowledge and awareness about pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine among budding medical students of college of medicine of Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and Methods

This study was carried out as a cross - sectional questionnaire based online survey among medical students of college of Medicine, Dawadmi, Shaqra University. The study was conducted from August 2020 to January 2021. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of college of medicine, Dawadmi, Shaqra University. The medical students of first year to final year were included in the study. Total of 150 students participated in the study. Online questionnaire was used due to restrictions by COVID - 19 pandemic during the study period. The questionnaires for Pharmacogenomics were designed by referring to the research article and for Personalized medicine was designed by referring to research articles Minor modifications to the questionnaire were made according to our Institution and students.8-10 Google forms were prepared and types of questions modified according to the different formats given in Google forms. The Google form link was circulated to student groups by email and also through What Sapp student groups. Data filled in Google forms were automatically documented in the response section of Google forms. The analysis of questionnaire responses was done by descriptive statistics and results are expressed in percentage % with the help of Google forms excel spread sheets.11

Results

Out Pharmacogenomics Experience and Attitude

Pharmacogenomics is relevant to my education 25 % strongly agreed, 20 % agreed and 13 % disagreed as shown in the Figure 1.

Figure shows 25% of students strongly agree, 20% agree that Pharmacogenomics is relevant to medical education and 13% did not agree.

In general, which do you predominantly base your drug dosing 50 % age, 42 % body weight, 38 % sex, 33 % body surface, 32 % indication? For the question of recommending pharmacogenomics test responded yes by 45 %, may be by 37 %, no by 18 %. Reason given for ordering Pharmacogenomics test, 43 % obligatory companion test, 34 % diagnostic, 36 % dose adjustments 32 % research purpose Tumor diagnostic 26 % Not applicable 12.7 %.

KnowledgeofPharmacogenomics

Familiarities with genetics only 16 % strongly agree as shown in the Figure 2 and 34 % learnt this topic from university. Only 21.2 % are familiar with pharmacology and drug metabolism and 42 % learnt this topic from University. 19 % are familiar with drug metabolizer phenotypes and 38 % learnt from university. 14 % are familiar with interpreting results of pharmacogenomics tests and 31 % learnt this from university. 43 % learn about pharmacogenomics testing and drug prescribing by internet sites, 31 % you tube, and 28 % by drug labels.

Pie chart shows the % of knowledge of students in different aspects of pharmacogenomics. Pie chart shows 21.2 % of the students are knowledgeable in Pharmacology and drug metabolism, 19 % in drug metabolizer, 16 % in genetics and 14 % in pharmacogenomics testing.

Knowledge Testing of Pharmacogenomics

Consequence of a pharmacogenomics polymorphism, 36 % says an individual cannot metabolize any drugs, 34 % individual has higher risk for toxicity when using prescription drugs, 23 % single drug dose appropriate for a given indication. The European Medicine Agency currently includes pharmacogenomics information in the drug labels for how many percentages of medications? 31 % says 11 - 50 %. For Poor Metabolizer (PM) phenotype indication, 36 % responded as lower drug safety because of poor metabolism, 25 % said good drug efficacy & decrease enzyme activity. Consequence of medication that induces CYP2D6 in poor metabolizer for CYP2D6. 41 % said no activity no consequence, 29 % decreased activity, 22 % increased activity.

NeedsAssessmentinPharmacogenomics

For identifying drugs that require pharmacogenomics testing, 16 % strongly agree, 19 % agree and 20 % disagree. Confident to use the results of pharmacogenomics tests to make an appropriate adjustment to a patient’s drug therapy, 36 % strongly agree, 20 % agree and 13 % disagree. For the question of which knowledge is essential to adjust the therapy based on pharmacogenomics tests? 40 % said need better knowledge on drug metabolism, 36 % genetics, 35 % Pharmacology. Preferred mode for learning more about pharmacogenomics in the future, 40 % by scientific article, 35 % conference talk, 33 % accredited learning course, 28 % Continuing medical education. How much time would you spend on an e â? learning program on pharmacogenomics? 31 % less than 30 minutes, 29 % for 60 minutes.

Knowledge and General Interest In Personalized Medicine Concept

For the question of indicate whether you have ever heard of the following terms? 42 % heard of personalized medicine, 38 % health care reform, 25 % individualized care and 39 % pharmacogenomics. Knowledge about personalized medicine 31 % chose the scale of 3 out of 7 (1 - Not at all, 7 - extremely knowledgeable), 7.6 % 2 out of 7, 21.2 % 4 out of 7, 16.9 % 5 out of 7, and 11 % 7 out of 7 (Extremely knowledgeable) shown in the Figure 3. How knowledgeable are you about health care reform 20 % responded in the scale of 4 and 5. Knowledge about Individualized care 33 % at scale of 3 knowledge about Pharmacogenomics 35 % at scale 3.

Figure shows the % of student’s knowledge in personalized medicine in a grading scale of 1-7 (1- not at all and 7-extremely knowledgeable). 31% of student’s responses are in the grading scale of 3, 21.2% in scale of 4, 16.9% in scale of 5, 11% in scale of 7, 9.3% in scale of 6 and 7.6% in scale of 1 and 2

Description of Personalized Medicine by the Participants Few Examples are Given

“a medicine for one person”, “a medical model that separates people into different groups”, “The form or dose of the drug works on one person and it can’t be described for other ”. “Personalized medicine means to me good knowledge about drugs to avoid side effects” Based on the information about personalized medicine, assuming cost is not an issue, how interested are you to take genetic test on a sample of your blood? 40 % responded that they will undergo genetic testing. Most valuable prediction of students related to personalized medicine, 48 % told minimizing the impact of diseases through preventive medicine. 39 % said it will help in tailoring treatment to individual patients, 38 % said it will predict future diseases and 17 % said it will help in predicting the good or bad effects of medicine as shown in the Figure 4. 52 % of the participants agreed to know about their risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, chronic disease such as Parkinson’s, Rheumatoid Arthritis diseases based on their genetics.

Bar diagram shows the students prediction about the benefits of personalized medicine in %. 48 % predicted that it will minimize the impact of diseases by preventive medicine, 39 % will help in tailoring the treatment individually, 38 % it will predict occurrence of future diseases and 17 % medicine effect.

Discussion

Pharmacogenomics

About the Pharmacogenomics experience and attitude. 25 % of students felt that the pharmacogenomics is relevant to their medical education. This is an important starting point that awareness is already present among medical students. A similar study done among medical students of Minnesota University USA found 15.9 % felt its relevant to medical education.12 45 % of students agreed to order Pharmacogenomics test as an obligatory test to know the efficacy and adverse drug effects coincides with the response of 62 % with a similar study conducted among pharmacist in Japan Regarding the knowledge of Pharmacogenomics, familiarity with genetics and pharmacogenomics is only 16 % and 19 % are familiar with drug metabolizer phenotypes, 14 % are familiar with interpreting results of pharmacogenomics tests.13 This shows there is lack of knowledge among medical students. Hence, this knowledge gap should be filled by taking adequate steps to include pharmacogenomics topics in undergraduate curriculum. A similar study conducted among practicing health practitioners showed 40 % familiarity.14 this may be due to the increased awareness and knowledge of health care practitioners about these areas. In terms of knowledge testing which also confirms inadequate knowledge among medical students about genetic polymorphism, pharmacogenomics information in the drug labels and poor metabolizers similar to a study done among medical students in India Only 16 % strongly agree that they can identify the drugs which need pharmacokinetic testing.15 36 % confident to use the results of pharmacogenomics tests to make an appropriate adjustment to a patient’s drug therapy. This show their interest in applying the pharmacogenomics testing but the knowledge is lacking. 40 % of the students agree that they need better knowledge on drug metabolism, genetics and pharmacology. Similar opinion was given by another study conducted in the same line.

Personalized Medicine

As far as the knowledge and general interest in concept of personal medicine, 42 % of students heard of the term personalized medicine. Only 31 % of students have knowledge about personalized medicine with a scale of 3 out of 7 (1 - Not at all and 7 - Extremely knowledgeable). This shows inadequate knowledge about personalized medicine among medical students. A similar study conducted in the same line showed only 7.9 % extremely knowledgeable, while 36.5 % were having lowest knowledge. The description of personalized medicine by each student was different. One participant described “The form or dose of the drug works on one person and it can’t be described for other”. Regarding the interest in prediction of personalized medicine in future, 52.2 % of the students interested in knowing about their risk for developing chronic disease through genetic testing. This is an encouraging result as the students are interested in knowing about the risk of developing future chronic illness and want to prevent it at the earliest. This is similar to a study done in Switzerland among healthcare consumers, which showed 56 % of participants expressed interest in knowing the risk of developing future debilitating diseases.

Conclusion

All the participated students expressed genuine interest about pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine. But the knowledge about these important fields is lacking. Hence including these important topics in the undergraduate medical curriculum will impart valuable knowledge to the future medical students.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the Dean, Vice-Dean and Head of the departments of Shaqra University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for giving us the opportunity to do this study.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

The study designed and carried out by Inbaraj S D, the data collection done by Faisal Fahad Al Otaibi. Aricle review by Noureldaim Elnoman Elbadawi, result analysis by Prasanna Mohana Bhaskaran, compiling done by Mohammad Azhar Rashikh and referencing done by Dinesh Dimri.

References

  1. Evans, William E, McLeod, Howard L. Pharmacogenomics — Drug Disposition, Drug Targets, and Side Effects. N Engl J Med 2003;348:538-549.
  2. Natalie H. Conference Scene: Report on the Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine 2011 Conference. Pharmacogenomics 2012;13(2):141-145.
  3. Issa AM. Ethical perspectives on pharmacogenomic profiling in the drug development process 2002;1(4):300-308.
  4. Daud ANA, Bergsma EL, Bergman JEH, et al. Knowledge and attitude regarding pharmacogenetics among formerly pregnant women in the Netherlands and their interest in pharmacogenetic research. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2017;17(1):120.
  5. Ginsburg GS, Willard HF. Genomic and personalized medicine: foundations and applications. Transl Res 2009;154(6):277 -87.
  6. Armstrong K. Can genomics bend the cost curve? JAMA 2012;14(10):1031â??1032.
  7. Krzyszczyk P, Acevedo A, Davidoff EJ, et al. The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Technology. Singap World Sci 2018;3(4):79-100.
  8. Just KS, Steffens M, Swen JJ, et al. Medical education in pharmacogenomics-results from a survey on pharmacogenetic knowledge in healthcare professionals within the European pharmacogenomics clinical implementation project Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2017;10:1247-1252.
  9. Garfeld, Susan & Douglas, Michael, et al. Consumer familiarity, perspectives and expected value of personalized medicine with a focus on applications in oncology. Per Med 2015;12:13-22.
  10. Altayyari, SarahT Omer, Anoud, et al. Knowledge and awareness on personalised medicine amongst medical students: A cross-sectional survey. J Health Sci 2017;5:171.
  11. Ali Z, S BB. Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Indian journal of anaesthesia 2016;60(9): 662-669.
  12. Moen M, Lamba J. Assessment of healthcare students' views on pharmacogenomics at the University of Minnesota. Pharmacogenomics 2012;13(13):1537-1545.
  13. Obara T, Abe S, Satoh M, et al. Awareness regarding clinical application of pharmacogenetics among Japanese pharmacists. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2015;8:35-341.
  14. Sharma Y, Cox L, Kruger L, et al. Evaluating Primary Care Providers’ Readiness for Delivering Genetic and Genomic Services to Underserved Populations. Public Health Genomics 2021.
  15. Agrawal M, Kirtania L, Jha A, et al. Students' knowledge and views on pharmacogenomic education in the medical curriculum. Indian J Pharmacol 2021;53(1):19-24.
  16. Ahmed N J, Alrawili A S, Alkhawaja F Z, et al. Knowledge and Awareness on Personalized Medicine amongst Health Care Specialists and University Students in Health Colleges in Saudi Arabia. J Pharm Res Int 2020;32(16):177-183.
  17. Mahlmann L, Rocke C, Brand A, et al. Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: An exploratory study. Appl Transl Genom 2016;8:9-15.
image